
The following letter was written by Noah Hobart Wells (1804-1872) to his brother-in-law, Hiram Bell (1807-1872), the husband of Mary Elizabeth (Wells) Bell (1811-1897). Noah and his younger brother Albert Wells (1807-Aft1880) were two of four brothers who all graduated from college, all became “professional” men, and all solemnly pledged to abstinence from alcohol. When this letter was penned in 1848, Noah and Albert Wells were operating the Peekskill Academy at Peekskill-on-the Hudson. The Peekskill Academy opened its doors in 1833 as a coeducational institution but by 1841 it decided to only admit boys. In 1857, it became a “military” academy.
In his letter, Noah reflects on Zachary Taylor’s election, arguing that New York proved decisive and hoping that voters will focus more on principles and policies than campaign spectacles such as hickory poles and hard cider. He also comments on Thanksgiving observances and condemns drunkenness and violence after an election-day riot, warning that unchecked vice threatens the entire community.

My thanks to Abbey Weber Jones for providing a first draft of this transcription.
T R A N S C R I P T I O N

Peekskill, [New York]
November 25, 1848
Dear Brother,
You probably think it strange that you hear nothing from me after so long a time, but our laborious occupation since the term began may be some apology, though I did not intend to wait till now before writing. After leaving Marlboro, I remained in Hartford till Tuesday. On sabbath morning, I heard Dr. [Horace] Bushnell 1 in the afternoon; Mr. Clark, and Dr. [Joel] Hawes in the evening. On Monday, walked about the city visiting several places of interest in company with General Buell, and cousin David [Wells] Kilbourn. The latter came in from Boston on Saturday a few minutes after my arrival. His son George [Erskine Kilbourne] was there. We visited the Secretary’s office, Athenaeum, and Charter Oak, and I afterward visited a few friends in the city. On Tuesday morning at nine o’clock, I left in the car for New Haven, reached New York [City] early in the evening, and came home on Wednesday evening.

Taking my visit altogether, I was much pleased, as from the nature and confinement of our business here a season of leisure twice a year may be said to be indispensable to health and spirits both, and if we can secure both repose and a pleasant change of objects, the effect is happy in various ways. But this love of change pursues us, and in order to be beneficial must be held in due bounds, and if rest and diversion are needful at times, a return to serious occupation at the proper period is no less requisite. Our school has filled more punctually than usual I believe, this term; we have twenty boarders, and above thirty day scholars, and more are expected, but probably there will after this time, be no considerable accession unless the three additional boarders who have been expected, should come. We have one boarder from Portland, opposite Middletown in your state. His name is Sparks. 2
I have been reading in the [New York] Observer some results of the election. It seems that General Taylor has a majority just equal to the electoral vote of New York; the majority of the popular vote in the Union is thought to be one hundred and forty thousand, of which 100,000 are in this state. It seems then that neither party could have succeeded without the vote of New York, and that in this instance New York is more properly the key stone state. So far as military fame has an influence in our elections, I think it is to be deprecated, but in the present case, as the matter appears to me, this consideration has had but partial weight, and much care has been used to ascertain principles, and to find out what measures the President elect could pursue. I hope, therefore, no more will be heard about hickory poles, or ash poles, or hard cider, connected with the dignified business of electing a president for twenty millions of people.
The day appointed for public thanksgiving in this state, you may observe, has occurred this week. We had a discourse in the morning by Mr. [David Mead] Halliday, and one in the evening by Mr. M’Kee. The time has not come, it seems, for an entire agreement upon one day throughout the Union; such a coincidence would add interest to the occasion, and this interest would be greatly increased would the public give countenance of the occasion by laying aside all business and allowing the world to see that they do in fact recognize their obligations to gratitude, and join the christian community in expressing it. Till something like this is done, there seems to be less propriety in speaking of an entire people offering up their united thanksgiving.
On election day we had, in a furious riot down at the river, a display of the beauties of the license law. As no law for the prevention of drunkenness can stand long among us, we must be content to pay the heavy expenses which crime must cost the community, and if such bitter experience cannot open the eyes of the people, and make them wise, it seems their folly must remain without a cure. If you should see in your quiet place, one half the iniquity that reigns in this village, you and your people would think the enemy had indeed come in like a flood, and that Satan had taken to himself his great power.
Has Mary got almost ready to write me a letter? Or can I not expect one from her this winter. Let us hear from you in the same way before long, and as often as may be during the long cold season that is approaching. Albert says he would like to hear from you all, and know how you are getting along, I have not seen cousin Edward since my return, but Albert says he heard from him. I have written to him today, inviting him to give us a call. It is more than a year since I saw him.
With love to all, — N. H. Wells
1 Dr. Horace Bushnell was a prominent Congregational minister and theologian who earned notoriety for challenging some traditional Calvinist doctrines, making him a somewhat controversial figure. When Wells heard him preach in November 1848, Bushnell was just entering one of the most controversial periods of his life as he experienced what he described as a profound spiritual illumination and soon delivered lectures that became the basis for “God in Christ,” a book that provoked accusations of heresy from conservative ministers.
2 Possibly Nathan Sparks, b. 1831; a resident of Portland, Middlesex county, Connecticut.


























